College
of Charleston
Academic
Affairs
Faculty
and Administration Manual
Technology
Transfer (Patent) Policy
0.0
CONTENTS
1.0
Introduction
2.0
Definitions
3.0
Policy
4.0
Procedures
1.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Relation of Technology Transfer to the Mission of the College
A
significant aspect of the College of Charleston’s public service mission
is to ensure that the results of its research are made available for public
use and benefit. This "technology transfer" is accomplished in many ways,
including educating students, publishing results of research, and ensuring
that discoveries and inventions are developed into useful processes and
products for public use in the commercial marketplace. The members of the
Board of Trustees of the College of Charleston recognize the importance
of obtaining the greatest public benefit and usefulness from the products
of the College’s scientific research and inventiveness, and that the protection
and control provided under patent laws and other legal means for the protection
of property rights may be necessary to obtain this goal.
1.2
Provision of Assistance to Inventors
It
is further recognized that employees of the College may require assistance
in determining and evaluating patentability and in prosecuting patent applications
for, or otherwise protecting, discoveries and inventions made by them.
Furthermore, many such inventions involve equities beyond those of the
inventor since the use of College facilities or resources, the assignment
of duties as a condition of employment, and the use of research funds with
contractual obligations regarding patent rights give rise to questions
concerning the rights and equities of all concerned.
1.3
Purpose of the College’s Patent Policy
The
purpose of this patent policy is to establish a mechanism to serve the
public benefit and interest; to determine and apprise all concerned parties
of relative rights and equities; to facilitate patent applications, the
licensing of inventions, and the equitable distribution of any royalties
or other financial returns; to provide necessary uniformity in patent matters;
and to provide for adequate reporting of patent activities.
1.4
Objectives of the College’s Patent Policy
Specific
objectives of the College’s patent policy are: (1) to disseminate new and
useful knowledge resulting from research at the College through the use
of the patent system; (2) to license patents to industry in order to promote
development of discoveries and inventions toward practical application;
(3) to provide income for use in supporting further research and education,
with a share of the income accruing to the inventor; and (4) to assure
that patent-related obligations to external sponsors of research are met.
1.5
Overview of the Technology Transfer Process
1.5.1
The U.S. Patent Process
New
ideas generated through the College’s research enterprise may require considerable
development before tangible research results are available for the public
benefit. The U.S. patent system provides an effective means for promoting
such development. The owner of a patent, or the owner’s authorized licensee,
is granted a limited period (20 years) of exclusivity to practice or use
the discovery or invention. This period of exclusivity provides the patent
holder with an opportunity to successfully develop products and exclude
others from copying the technology and offering competing products. In
return for this limited right to exclude others, federal law requires the
applicant for a patent to disclose details of the discovery or invention,
thereby making new knowledge available to everyone and stimulating others
to make further discoveries and inventions.
1.5.2
Patent Rights Following Publication of a Discovery or Invention
The
timing of communications to the academic community or public can be a factor
in the determination of patent rights. U.S. patent law allows for the filing
of a patent application within a one-year grace period after the first
"publication," the definition of which is highly technical under both U.S.
and foreign patent laws. Any one of the many and various forms of academic
communications or public use may establish the date from which the one-year
filing period is measured. The filing deadline is referred to as the "publication
bar date." Public disclosure of an invention before filing a U.S. patent
application will preclude patent rights in nearly all foreign countries.
2.0
DEFINITIONS
2.1
College Employee
For
the purposes of this policy, a College employee is defined as a permanent
or temporary full-time or part-time employee or an undergraduate or graduate
student performing research.
2.2
Potentially Patentable Discoveries and Inventions
Potentially
patentable discoveries and inventions include novel machines and devices;
compositions of matter (compounds; mixtures; genetically engineered cells,
plants, and animals); genetic forms; plant varieties; software and computer
systems; production processes; etc. or a related improvement to any of
the foregoing or a new use for a known material or device.
3.0
POLICY
3.1
It is the policy of the Board of Trustees to encourage the concept that
patentable inventions produced at the College shall be used for the greatest
possible public benefit and to provide every reasonable incentive to the
faculty and staff for the disclosure, evaluation, and dissemination of
such inventions. When College support makes the research effort possible
or when the College provides support for the discovery or the development
of a patentable invention, it is reasonable for the College to participate
in the fruits of such development, including reimbursement for its costs.
To that end, the Board encourages the prosecution of patents for such inventions
and the licensing thereof in the interest of the public, the inventor,
and the College.
3.2
Under College policy, all potentially patentable discoveries and inventions
made by College employees with the use of College resources must be disclosed
to the College in a timely manner. College resources include personnel
time (e.g., work leading to the invention or discovery was performed
by the inventor, other College employees, and/or students during normal
working hours), College facilities (e.g., office space, laboratory
space, other campus facilities; administrative and technical services provided
by the College (e.g., telephone, fax, photocopying, data processing,
network connections); College-owned equipment (e.g., laboratory
equipment; computers, printers, and plotters; field equipment; office equipment),
and expendable materials and supplies purchased by the College (e.g.,
office, data processing, and laboratory supplies, chemicals, and biological
materials). Prompt disclosure of a discovery or invention made with the
use of College resources allows for determination of the assignability
of rights to the invention or discovery and, as necessary, to plan the
further communication regarding the discovery or invention so that the
U.S. and foreign patent rights will not be compromised.
3.3
College employees, students of the College, or external parties (e.g.,
"off the street") may request that the College accept, for management and
commercialization, intellectual discoveries and inventions, which are theirs
alone (e.g., have been discovered or developed without the use of
College resources). The College may opt to assess such discoveries and
inventions for potential commercialization and may enter into an agreement
to manage and commercialize such discoveries or inventions. These discoveries
and inventions will be assigned to the Office of Research and Grants Administration
for management in accordance with these policies and procedures and, if
applicable, terms of the gift agreement from the third party.
4.0
PROCEDURES FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
4.1
Disclosure of Discovery or Invention
Reporting
of discoveries and inventions is accomplished by submitting a "Discovery
and Invention Disclosure" form to the Office of Research and Grants
Administration. This form provides information necessary for the College
to evaluate inventorship, assignment obligations, patentability, the desirability
of obtaining patent coverage, and patent obligations to external research
sponsors. This information is confidential and should be kept confidential
by the inventor.
4.2
Determination of External Sponsor Rights
The
Office of Research and Grants Administration will first review the discovery
and invention disclosure to determine patent obligations owed to external
sponsors of the research. The Research and Grants Administration Office
will report such invention disclosures to the sponsor(s) as required. Because
of the confidential nature of inventions, inventors should not report inventions
directly to sponsors.
4.2.1
Provisions in Grant and Contract Agreements
4.2.1.1
Grant and contract agreements (including cooperative agreements and procurements)
with sponsors supporting College research projects or transferring materials
for research purposes often contain patent provisions. Those provisions
establish the rights of the various parties in potentially patentable discoveries
that may be made or inventions that may be developed during performance
of the research agreement. The existing patent obligations of all parties
must be fully understood in order to avoid conflicting obligations in proposed
new agreements relating to the discovery or invention.
4.2.1.2
The level of sponsor support generally determines the extent of patent
rights available to the sponsor. In order to obtain a first right to negotiate
an exclusive license, an industrial funding sponsor must fund all the costs
of the College research, including full overhead costs and a pro-rata share
of the principal investigator's salary.
4.3
Patent Rights in Federally Funded Research
Federally
funded research has special provisions on rights to inventions. The Bayh-Dole
Act gives the College title to discoveries and inventions arising from
federally funded research. However, the College must grant non-exclusive
use rights to the federal government. Also, if the College decides not
to file a patent application on a discovery or invention and will not otherwise
commercialize it, the College is required to return patent rights to the
federal government.
4.4
Assessment of Assignability
The
Director of Research and Grants Administration will appoint an ad hoc
Discovery and Invention Review Committee (DIRC) to assess the discovery
or invention to determine whether it will be assigned to the College or
whether it will remain the property of the College employee. The DIRC will
be comprised of the chair of the inventor’s department (or the dean of
the inventor’s school in the event the inventor is a department chair),
the Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs (or his/her designee), the
university attorney, the Director of Research and Grants Administration,
and three faculty members who are knowledgeable in the area of the invention,
to be selected in consultation with the inventor and the chair of the inventor’s
department. These committee members will have voting status. All members
of the committee will be required to sign confidentiality agreements before
learning the details of the discovery or invention. The inventor is expected
to work closely with this committee in providing all required information
about and explanations of the discovery or invention and its potential
uses.
4.4.1
All ownership rights shall be assigned to the College for any discovery
or invention made by a College employee which:
4.4.1.1
Results from research carried out by, or under the direction of, the College
employee which is funded by a federal agency or with federal funds flowing
through a state agency or other organization;
4.4.1.2
Results from research carried out by, or under the direction of, the College
employee which is funded by the College or from non-federal funds which
are under the control of or administered by the College; or
4.4.1.3
Has been developed using resources or facilities belonging to the College.
4.4.2
If the College employee makes the discovery or invention while engaged
in outside consulting activities and does not involve the use of College
funds, facilities, or other resources, ownership rights shall remain with
the individual.
4.4.3
If it is determined that the discovery or invention is not assignable to
the College, a release shall be executed by the Office of Research and
Grants Administration in favor of the inventor.
4.5
Preliminary Evaluation of the Discovery or Invention
A
discovery or invention which is assigned to the College will undergo a
preliminary evaluation to determine whether the College desires to apply
for a patent in the name of the inventor.
4.5.1
The Discovery and Invention Review Committee will conduct the preliminary
evaluation. The Senior Vice President for Business Affairs (or his/her
designee) will serve the DIRC in a non-voting advisory capacity in this
evaluation. If sufficient expertise to evaluate the patentability of the
discovery or invention is not available in-house, the Director of Research
and Grants Administration may also appoint, in a non-voting capacity, a
non-College affiliated scientist with appropriate expertise to advise the
DIRC. The DIRC and its advisors will assess such factors as patentability,
benefit to the public, commercial potential, patent rights of outside parties,
impending publication bar dates, the expected cost of patent prosecution,
and benefits that might accrue to the College and the inventor. Advisors
to the committee will be required to sign confidentiality agreements before
learning the details of the discovery or invention.
4.5.2
During the period of preliminary evaluation, the inventor is expected to
keep the Office of Research and Grants Administration apprised of any action
he/she is contemplating, especially publications or other public disclosures
that might affect rights in the discovery or invention.
4.5.3
The Office of Research and Grants Administration and the Discovery and
Invention Review Committee shall act promptly in carrying out the preliminary
evaluation so that the property rights of the inventor and the College
are protected and so that publication of research results through normal
academic channels is not delayed. The Discovery and Invention Review Committee,
however, may request further development of the invention before final
action is taken in the evaluation.
4.5.4
If it is determined that the College has no interest in the discovery or
invention, a release will be executed by the Office of Research and Grants
Administration in favor of the inventor, subject to any applicable sponsor
agreements.
4.5.5
If the Discovery and Invention Review Committee determines that an assignable
discovery or invention qualifies for further consideration, marketing of
the discovery or invention to find a qualified licensee will be initiated.
The goals of marketing are to assess commercial interest in the discovery
or invention and to find qualified licensee(s).
4.6
Securing the Preliminary Opinion on Patentability
When
sufficient information on the potential patentability and the commercial
viability has been gathered and sufficient financial resources are available
from either the College or a qualified licensee, the case will be referred
to a patent attorney to conduct a prior art search in the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office and render a preliminary opinion on patentability. Alternatively,
the College may enter into an agreement with a technology transfer organization
to determine patentability. A preliminary opinion on patentability of the
discovery or invention is normally issued within 60 to 120 days.
4.7
Pursuing the U.S. Patent
4.7.1
If, based on the preliminary opinion, the College decides to proceed with
filing a patent application, the Office of Research and Grants Administration
will coordinate the process. A patent attorney (or a technology transfer
organization) will be engaged to draft the patent application. The inventor
is expected to work closely with the attorney (or the technology transfer
organization) to complete the application. The completed patent application
will then be submitted in the inventor's name to the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office. At the time of filing of the application, the inventor will execute
legal documents assigning the patent to the College.
4.7.2
When the application is filed, the patent attorney, the Director of Research
and Grants Administration, and the inventor will work together to respond
to the patent examiner’s requests for information (called "Office Actions")
and to seek the broadest possible protection for the discovery or invention.
(In general, about a year will elapse before the patent examiner takes
the first substantive action on a newly filed patent application. Final
approval may take two or more years.)
4.8
Filing for Foreign Patents
Because
procedures for filing patent applications in foreign countries are varied,
complex, and very costly, the Office of Research and Grants Administration
recommends filing foreign patent applications only when the cost is likely
to be recovered from a licensee. (Note: Public disclosure of an invention
before filing a U.S. patent application will preclude patent rights in
nearly all foreign countries. If a publication has been made after a U.S.
patent application filing, a preliminary foreign filing must be made within
one year of the U.S. filing date in order to preserve rights in other countries.)
4.9
Licensing of the Discovery or Invention
4.9.1
To pursue the licensing of a discovery or invention, the inventor will
assist the Director of Research and Grants Administration in identifying
companies that may be interested in licensing the discovery or invention.
The Director of Research and Grants Administration will then contact appropriate
companies to assess their interest in obtaining a license to the patent
rights. (Note that licensing often occurs before the patent issues.) Coordination
of all licensing contacts by the Office of Research and Grants Administration
serves the interest of both the inventor and the College, and information
the inventor provides regarding potential licensees is important to this
process.
4.9.2
If a private company contacts an inventor directly, the inventor should
refer the company to the Office of Research and Grants Administration.
The College may permit evaluation of an invention by potential licensees
prior to the issuance of a patent through use of a Confidentiality Agreement
executed by both the College and the potential commercial partner.
4.9.3
When the Office of Research and Grants Administration identifies an appropriate
commercial partner, a license agreement will be negotiated and executed
on behalf of the Board of Trustees. Terms and conditions for licensing
agreements vary and will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis. If a company
needs time to evaluate an invention, an option acknowledgment may be negotiated.
An exclusive license may be granted in instances where one commercial sponsor
provided all of the funding for the research, or when it is the best way
to assure development of the invention. An exclusive license must provide
for diligent development of the invention, and it usually includes a minimum
annual payment.
4.9.4
In some instances, a licensee may wish to engage the College inventor as
an independent consultant to assist the licensee in transferring the technology
from the academic to the private sector. The College does not usually become
party to such consulting arrangements. However, College policies on faculty
and employee consulting apply to this situation, and the inventor should
ensure that any such consulting arrangements addressing patent or invention
rights contain the phrase "subject to prior obligations to the College
of Charleston."
4.9.5
In some situations, it may be in the bests interests of the College, the
general public, and the inventor to enter into commercialization agreements
with entities wholly or partially owned by the inventor. Such arrangements
may be considered and accepted, provided law does not specifically prohibit
them and that adequate provisions, including full disclosure of interests,
are made to avoid or otherwise protect against conflict of interest on
the part of those involved. The Office of Research and Grants Administration
will handle such negotiations.
4.9.6
If an invention was conceived or reduced to practice in whole or in part
under a research agreement (grant, contract, cooperative agreement, or
procurement) with a federal agency, the U.S. government also receives a
royalty-free license for government use, which is issued by the College.
4.10
Distribution of Royalties
4.10.1
Gross royalties, license fees, or other such payments, which are usually
expressed as a percentage of sales or a fixed dollar amount per unit manufactured
in return for the right to use, copy, reproduce, make, or sell an item
of intellectual property or a product based on such property, will be negotiated
with the licensee by the Office of Research and Grants Administration as
a part of the license agreement. Rates depend on a variety of factors such
as the value of the invention, the cost of commercializing the invention,
and whether the license is exclusive or nonexclusive.
4.10.2
Net royalties will be calculated by subtracting from gross royalties, license
fees, or other such payments the up front and direct costs of patenting
and protection of patent rights, including attorneys’ fees and/or fees
of any technology transfer organization retained to pursue the patent,
and College funds used in further development of the discovery or invention.
4.10.3
Net royalties will be shared between the inventor and the College. When
there are two or more inventors who are employees of the College, each
will share equally in the income unless the inventors agree on an alternative
distribution. When a joint invention arises involving another institution,
net royalties will be shared with that institution and/or its inventor.
4.10.4
Net royalties will be distributed as follows:
50%
to Inventor (and/or his/her heirs and assigns)
15%
to Inventor’s Department or Administrative Unit (earmarked for research)
15%
to Inventor’s School or Division (earmarked for research)
20%
to College of Charleston (for the enhancement of research and education)
4.10.5
The College employee whose invention is licensed to an entity in which
he/she has a proprietary interest (e.g., company officer, founder’s
equity position, stock holdings exceeding ten percent of the total issued,
etc.) will not receive the discoverer’s/inventor’s share of College net
royalties. In this case, the net royalties will be distributed as follows:
35%
to Inventor’s Department or Administrative Unit (earmarked for research)
35%
to Inventor’s School or Division (earmarked for research)
30%
to College of Charleston (for the enhancement of research and education)
4.10.6
The College employee whose invention is licensed to an entity in which
he/she has a proprietary interest (e.g., company officer, founder’s
equity position, stock holdings exceeding ten percent of the total issued,
etc.) will receive his/her share of net royalties from any other licenses.
4.10.7
The Office of Research and Grants Administration reserves the right to
suspend distribution of income when there is reason to believe that substantial
deductible costs will be incurred in the future. The inventor will be informed
of such decisions.
4.10.8
The Office of Research and Grants Administration and the Office of the
Controller will do accounting for patent income and expenses. Royalty payments
will be made to inventors in August of each year on amounts received in
the previous fiscal year (July 1 to June 30).
4.11
Releasing Rights to Inventors
Where
no overriding sponsor rights exist, patent rights may be released to the
inventor when the College elects not to file a patent application or to
commercialize a discovery or invention or when the equity of the situation
clearly indicates such release should be given. Even if outside sponsorship
is involved, the inventor may be able to obtain rights. The Office of Research
and Grants Administration will assist the inventor in these procedures,
and in the procedures necessary for the inventor to obtain clear title
from sponsoring federal agencies, if applicable.
4.12
Appeal Procedures
4.12.1
Internal Appeals Process
Any
disputes concerning application of this policy shall be resolved by a panel
of three members upon written appeal to the Office of Research and Grants
Administration. The panel will be comprised of a representative selected
by the inventor, a representative designated by the Senior Vice President
for Business Affairs, and a third person selected by the other two members.
None of the panel members shall have served as voting or non-voting members
on the Discovery and Invention Review Committee.
4.12.2
Mandatory Binding Arbitration
Any
disputes arising under this policy that are not resolved to the satisfaction
of either party under the internal appeals process shall be submitted to
mandatory, binding arbitration under the guidelines and procedures of the
American Arbitration Association. The parties shall agree upon one arbitrator
to resolve the matter. If the parties are unable to agree upon a single
arbitrator, then each party shall select one arbitrator and these two arbitrators
shall select a third arbitrator. This three-person panel shall conduct
an arbitration hearing and render a final, binding decision.
Sponsor:
Research & Grants Administration Date: July 17, 1998
Provisional
Approval: President Date: July 24, 1998
Review:
Business Affairs Date: July 27, 1998
Revised:
Research & Grants Administration Date: July 28, 1998
Review:
Faculty Senate Date: June 1, 1999
Review:
Legal Affairs Date: March 6, 2000
Final
Approval: College of Charleston Board of Trustees Date: July 26, 2000
|